Educational only, not medical advice. Pepvise reviews are educational. They are not medical advice. Consult your prescriber before starting any peptide protocol.
Peptide sequence diagram of CJC-1295, a tetrasubstituted GHRH analogue; research compound, not FDA-approved.
CJC-1295 , tetrasubstituted GHRH(1-29) analogue · Research peptide (not FDA-approved for human use)
CJC-1295 peptide sequence (research peptide).
Image: CMollerup via Wikimedia Commons / Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). Editorial use for educational purposes only.

Analysis

ConjuChem's modified GHRH analogue with a Drug Affinity Complex (DAC) tail extending the half-life from minutes to roughly 8 days. Teichman 2006 (J Clin Endocrinol Metab) is the foundational human pharmacokinetic study. Subsequent development was limited; CJC-1295 did not advance beyond Phase 1/2.

CJC-1295 is a synthetic GHRH analogue based on the GRF(1-29) sequence, modified with a Drug Affinity Complex (DAC) tail that binds reversibly to circulating albumin and extends the half-life from approximately 7 minutes (native GHRH) to roughly 8 days. Teichman 2006 (JCEM) is the foundational human PK study and the basis for the once-weekly dosing rationale that subsequent research-peptide protocols inherited. The mechanism case is strong: pulsatile GH release stimulation at the pituitary, with downstream IGF-1 elevation. The development pathway never advanced beyond Phase 1/2, ConjuChem's clinical program shifted away from CJC-1295 in the late 2000s, and the molecule has not been picked up by another sponsor for regulated development since. Methodology v1.2 scores CJC-1295 5.2, mechanism clean, human dossier sparse beyond the foundational PK paper. The peptide remains heavily marketed in the research channel, often paired with ipamorelin in dual-protocol marketing, that combination has no published Phase 2 efficacy data and the protocol marketing pattern is one of the more visible examples of mechanism-storytelling outpacing trial evidence. WADA prohibits CJC-1295 under Class S2; athletic populations should not use the molecule.

SIDE BY SIDE

Top four on every dimension.

Higher is better. Numbers are tabular, the methodology is on the methodology page, and yes, vendor trust counts because counterfeit risk is real.

#COMPOUNDEVIDENCEMECHANISMHUMAN DATAVENDOR TRUSTSAFETYTOTAL
6CJC-1295
GRF(1-29) analogue with DAC modification
5.57.53.04.55.55.2
7Ipamorelin
GHRP-class growth-hormone secretagogue
5.57.03.04.56.05.2
8Tesamorelin
synthetic GHRH analogue (Egrifta)
8.08.07.57.57.57.7
9Sermorelin
GHRH(1-29), formerly Geref
5.57.05.06.06.56.0

Pros and cons

WHAT WORKSWHAT DOES NOT
The DAC modification is one of the more biochemically-elegant half-life extensions in the GHRH-analogue class, the published PK paper (Teichman 2006) established the once-weekly dosing rationale.Human evidence is limited to Phase 1 PK and small-cohort dose-finding studies; no Phase 2 efficacy trials in any indication have published outcomes.
Phase 1 tolerability profile across the published cohorts was clean; no major safety signals in the studied dose ranges.WADA-prohibited (Class S2 peptide hormones); athletic-population use carries sanctions risk.
Mechanism is well-defined: GHRH receptor agonism at the pituitary, leading to pulsatile rather than tonic GH release.The CJC-1295 / Ipamorelin combination popular in research-peptide protocols has no Phase 2 evidence base for the combination therapy.
, Counterfeit incidence in the research-channel market is high; identity verification by mass spectrometry is the only reliable method.

Alternatives we tested

Three compounds that came up in the same comparison set.

References

3 cited
  1. Teichman et al. 2006, CJC-1295 long-acting GHRH analogue, J Clin Endocrinol Metab
  2. Ionescu & Frohman 2006, GHRH analogues review, J Clin Endocrinol Metab
  3. WADA Prohibited List 2026
Last tested
Scored on v1.2